Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!
      
Fantasy Football Today
Fantasy Football Today Blog
Gameday Inactives
2014 Draft Prep Guide
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Get Your Draft Board
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Scores
Fantasy Games
Playoff Challenge
Commissioner
Prize Leagues
Free
Office Pool Manager
Game Pick'em
Player Challenge
Fantasy Baseball Today
Fantasy Baseball Today Blog
2015 Draft Prep Guide
Mock Drafts
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Rankings
Projections
Schedules
Probable Pitchers
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injuries
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Message Boards
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Downloadable Draft Kit
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
No Fantasy Teams Found
 
 
 

Disclaimed interest by NBPA? Here's what it means to labor squabble

Matt Moore
CBSSports.com Senior NBA Blogger
  •  

Meet the new faces of the NBA players' labor fight -- David Boies (left) and Jeffrey Kessler. (Getty Images)  
Meet the new faces of the NBA players' labor fight -- David Boies (left) and Jeffrey Kessler. (Getty Images)  

So the NBPA decided to circumvent any more playing footsy with the NBA and just decertified. Only they didn't decertify. They "disclaimed interest." Here's what that actually means.

What's the difference between decertification and a disclaimer of interest?

Collective bargaining was established to protect employers in their negotiations with unions and vice-versa. Subsequently, it was established in U.S. law that employers are exempt from antitrust litigation, provided they stay within the framework of collective bargaining. So if you want to sue your employer for antitrust, you need to dissolve your union.

You can do that two ways. You can decertify, which involves what we've been talking about, where union membership petitions for a vote to decertify the union; the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) verifies that petition; and then a vote is held to decertify, needing a simple majority to pass. Or you can disclaim interest -- which means union leadership dissolves itself. Decertification is bottom-up; disclaimer of interest is top-down.

So which is better, disclaimer of interest or decertification?

There are advantages and drawbacks to both. Decertification takes longer, which is the primary reason the NBPA elected to go the other route. A disclaimer of interest essentially goes into effect immediately upon paperwork being filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. The National Basketball Trade Association's new lawyers told reporters Monday that should they elect to file suit against the NBA (which they will), they won't be seeking an injunction, but a summary judgment.

More on NBA lockout
Analysis

Stories

Disclaim of interest brings with it a greater threat the court will rule it a "sham" negotiating tactic, but to counter that the agents behind the recent decertification movement will submit their petitions for an involuntary decertification as counter-evidence. Disclaim of interest also removes the NLRB from interest in the case -- without a union, the NLRB has no jurisdiction. In short, disclaimer of interest is faster, but doesn't carry the weight decertification does.

Can the players and league still negotiate?

In the interim, between the disclaimer and the suit being considered, negotiations can take place ... but not with the players as a whole. They no longer exist as a collective entity. Teams can negotiate only with individual players. And of course the teams won't, since they consider this to be a "sham" dissolution meant only as a negotiating tactic. Also, the NBA would lose its protection from antitrust laws if it negotiated with individual players instead of a union.

The only way a new CBA is ratified is if the threat of legal action -- or a summary judgment with substantial damages -- forces the league to abandon its position and cave to the players.

I'll let you determine the odds of that based on your working knowledge of, you know, logic. But if you want the legal perspective, based on the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in the NFL case as well as antitrust standards, David Scupp, an antitrust litigation expert, says that while the players may not have a lot to lose in this pursuit based on where the CBA negotiations were, "their prospects are not great."

Why didn't the players decertify?

Because it takes longer. But the other thing to consider is that an involuntary decertification provides protection from the "sham" argument. A movement from within the players against union leadership to dissolve the union is pretty unlikely to be determined to be a sham. In contrast, the disclaimer of interest is more succeptible to that, although the players have have substantial evidence that disclaiming was their only option after the league negotiator repeatedly issued ultimatums and informed them that negotiations were over unless the players accepted their offer. That's one of the many questions to be answered.

What happens next?

If we assume the players are going to file suit -- which is what's going to happen, that's why you do this -- then the first question is where the case will be heard. The players will want California, the 9th Circuit, which is more favorable toward unions. The league will push for the same court they filed suit in, the 2nd Circuit in New York, which has been their friend in the past. From there, the players will ask for a summary judgment. The court proceedings regarding the actual suit cannot begin until the issue of where the case will be heard is settled, a process that takes more time off the season's clock.

A summary judgment? Not to get too technical on you, but it's basically looking for the court to say, "Obviously! Of course the NBA is wrong! Here you go!" It seeks to circumvent a trial in cases with no disputes of "material fact." Scupp told CBSSports.com that a summary judgment is granted when the court rules there are "no issues of fact" and that a trial is not needed. In short, the players want to get around the wait of a trial and gain a decision in their favor as quickly as possible. There still have to be motions, exhibits, discovery, etc., so a summary judgment could take longer than an injunction -- but it potentially has more value. The NFL players got an injunction lifting the lockout in their antitrust case against the NFL, but it was lifted in a matter of days while the 8th Circuit considered the appeal.

Scupp says the players could file for the summary judgment specifically on the grounds that the NBA's lockout is illegal. In that scenario, if granted, the players could earn triple their lost salary in damages -- as opposed to an injunction, which would simply lift the lockout and force the players to resume play. Ken Berger of CBSSports.com reports that if the summary judgment was granted in 60 days, which is the soonest it could be (and even that is a stretch), the league could face damages as high as $2.4 billion. As the 8th Circuit ruled that the court could not enjoin such a lockout, the players are looking to dodge that question and instead focus on the fact that the court did not rule on whether the lockout was in fact legal.

In any instance, Scupp says it's likely the NBA would file a counter-motion for its own summary judgment. Such a ruling would block any further efforts by the players outside of appeal on the grounds of the lockout being illegal. The NBA also would appeal a possible summary judgment against it, but the impact of having a potentially multi-billion-dollar judgment against the owners might be enough to prompt them to settle.

Also, there are expected to be at least two lawsuits -- a class-action suit challenging every aspect of the NBA business, such as the salary cap, luxury tax and draft as antitrust violations, and another one specifically on behalf of rookies and free agents.

Why the second one? In the majority opinion in the NFL case, the 8th Circuit panel specifically questioned whether employees who are not under contract can be locked out. It could be on behalf of such rookies and free agents that the players would be able to achieve their quickest and most decisive legal opinion rejecting the NBA's operations as illegal.

From there, we start to answer the question of whether the players have a case here, and what legal victories they can obtain. Then the league will appeal, and the question will be whether the impact of the initial ruling will be sustained during the appeals process. Then the players need to survive the appeals process, and likely more until the league either decides to cave or it runs out of courts to appeal to.

It could take years for the case to wind through the appeals process, something that neither side will want to sustain given the current state of negotiations.

Get player news notifications, manage your team and check scores
- all updated in real time. Download the CBS Fantasy App.

  •  
 
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
 
 
Player News
Report: Warriors sign guard Leandro Barbosa
by Sean d'Oliveira | CBSSports.com
(7:51 pm ET) The Warriors agreed to a one-year, $2.5 million deal with guard Leandro Barbosa on Monday, reports ESPNLosAngeles.com.

Barbosa averaged 7.1 points and 1.5 assists in 66 games last season for the Warriors.


Report: Jazz close to signing Joe Ingles
by Sean d'Oliveira | CBSSports.com
(7:36 pm ET) The Jazz are closing in on a deal with forward Joe Ingles, sources told Yahoo Sports.

Ingles averaged 5.0 points and 2.2 rebounds in 79 games last season. 


Report: Cavaliers seeking to land Clippers SG Jamal Crawford
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(5:16 pm ET) The search of the Cavaliers to bolster their bench has them discussing a deal that would bring super sixth man Jamal Crawford over from the Clippers, sources have told ESPN.

Cleveland would dump Brendan Haywood in the trade.

Crawford has been instant offense throughout his career. But he shot just 39.6 percent from the floor last year, his second-worst accuracy since the 2004-05 season. He still averaged an impressive 15.8 points in 27 minutes per game.


Report: Mavericks sign PG J.J. Barea to two-year contract
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(5:05 pm ET) Point guard J.J. Barea has agreed to a two-year deal worth $5.6 million to stay with the Mavericks, according to Puerto Rican newspaper El Nueva Dia.

Reports also claim that he has a player option for a third season.

Barea averaged 7.5 points and 3.4 assists last season in 18 minutes per game as a reserve.


Report: PF David West signs with Spurs for veteran minimum
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(4:57 pm ET) The Spurs continued to bolster their frontcourt Monday by signing veteran forward David West, league sources have told TNT, which is further reporting that it's for the veteran minimum.

The 34-year-old West, who will now make just $1.4 million next season, sought to play for a title contender.

West scored just 11.7 points per game and shot 47.2 percent from the field last year for Indiana. Both represent his worst numbers since his second season in the NBA.


Report: Grizzlies C Marc Gasol signs five-year contract
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(4:38 pm ET) Blossoming Grizzlies center Marc Gasol claimed he was not interested in joining any other team - and he proved it Monday by signing a five-year deal worth more than $100 million to remain in Memphis, league sources have told Yahoo Sports.

Gasol proved consistent and productive last year in placing himself in the NBA Most Valuable Player conversation. He averaged 17.4 points and 7.8 rebounds in 33 minutes per game during the regular season before leading them into the Western Conference semifinals.

He stepped up his fine work in the playoffs, averaging 19.7 points and 10.3 points in 11 games while attacking the basket aggressively enough to average eight foul shots per game.


Report: Fading PF Carlos Boozer targeted by several teams
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(4:19 pm ET) Several teams are in the mix to land veteran power forward Carlos Boozer, sources have told ESPN, which is claiming he has had conversations with the Clippers, Spurs, Mavericks and Raptors.

The 33-year-old Boozer showed signs of age last season with the Lakers. He averaged just 11.8 points a game, his lowest since his rookie year, and a career-worst 6.8 rebounds. But he was limited to 24 minutes per game and shot nearly 50 percent from the floor.


Report: Timberwolves pull qualifying offer to F Robbie Hummel
by Marty Gitlin | CBSSports.com
(3:35 pm ET) The Timberwolves have withdrawn their qualifying offer to forward Robbie Hummel, sources have told The Associated Press, which is claiming that their acquisition of Euroleague Most Valuable Player Nemanja Bjelica negated their need for Hummel.

Hummel averaged just 4.4 points and 3.0 rebounds in 16 minutes per game last season. He is now free to shop his services.


Spurs guard Manu Ginobili to return for upcoming season
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(2:39 pm ET) Spurs guard Manu Ginobili announced via his Twitter that he would be returning to the team for the 2015-16, writing "Happy to announce that I'm coming back next season." Contract details between the team and Ginobili are still being finalized. 

Last season, Ginobili averaged 10.5 points in 70 games, while shooting 42.6 percent from the floor, the second-worst mark of his 13-year career. He said after the season, he would have to think about returning for another campaign. 

In his Twitter announcement, Ginobili closed with the hashtag #TDwouldvemissedmetoomuch, a reference to friend and teammate Tim Duncan, who recently announced he was returning to the Spurs for another year. 


Nets reach deal with forward Rondae Hollis-Jefferson
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(12:42 pm ET) The Nets and first-round pick Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, whom they acquired in a draft-night trade with the Trail Blazers, have reached agreement on a multi-year contract, per the Daily News

Hollis-Jefferson, who was picked at No. 23 before being dealt in exchange for center Mason Plumlee, will make around $1.3 million this year based on the rookie wage scale. He is playing for the Nets' summer league team in Orlando. 


 
 
 
Top Videos
Rankings