Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!
      
Fantasy Football Today
Fantasy Football Today Blog
Gameday Inactives
2014 Draft Prep Guide
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Get Your Draft Board
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Scores
Fantasy Games
Playoff Challenge
Commissioner
Prize Leagues
Free
Office Pool Manager
Game Pick'em
Player Challenge
Fantasy Baseball Today
Fantasy Baseball Today Blog
2015 Draft Prep Guide
Mock Drafts
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Rankings
Projections
Schedules
Probable Pitchers
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injuries
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Message Boards
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Downloadable Draft Kit
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
No Fantasy Teams Found
 
 
 

Disclaimed interest by NBPA? Here's what it means to labor squabble

Matt Moore
CBSSports.com Senior NBA Blogger
  •  

Meet the new faces of the NBA players' labor fight -- David Boies (left) and Jeffrey Kessler. (Getty Images)  
Meet the new faces of the NBA players' labor fight -- David Boies (left) and Jeffrey Kessler. (Getty Images)  

So the NBPA decided to circumvent any more playing footsy with the NBA and just decertified. Only they didn't decertify. They "disclaimed interest." Here's what that actually means.

What's the difference between decertification and a disclaimer of interest?

Collective bargaining was established to protect employers in their negotiations with unions and vice-versa. Subsequently, it was established in U.S. law that employers are exempt from antitrust litigation, provided they stay within the framework of collective bargaining. So if you want to sue your employer for antitrust, you need to dissolve your union.

You can do that two ways. You can decertify, which involves what we've been talking about, where union membership petitions for a vote to decertify the union; the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) verifies that petition; and then a vote is held to decertify, needing a simple majority to pass. Or you can disclaim interest -- which means union leadership dissolves itself. Decertification is bottom-up; disclaimer of interest is top-down.

So which is better, disclaimer of interest or decertification?

There are advantages and drawbacks to both. Decertification takes longer, which is the primary reason the NBPA elected to go the other route. A disclaimer of interest essentially goes into effect immediately upon paperwork being filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. The National Basketball Trade Association's new lawyers told reporters Monday that should they elect to file suit against the NBA (which they will), they won't be seeking an injunction, but a summary judgment.

More on NBA lockout
Analysis

Stories

Disclaim of interest brings with it a greater threat the court will rule it a "sham" negotiating tactic, but to counter that the agents behind the recent decertification movement will submit their petitions for an involuntary decertification as counter-evidence. Disclaim of interest also removes the NLRB from interest in the case -- without a union, the NLRB has no jurisdiction. In short, disclaimer of interest is faster, but doesn't carry the weight decertification does.

Can the players and league still negotiate?

In the interim, between the disclaimer and the suit being considered, negotiations can take place ... but not with the players as a whole. They no longer exist as a collective entity. Teams can negotiate only with individual players. And of course the teams won't, since they consider this to be a "sham" dissolution meant only as a negotiating tactic. Also, the NBA would lose its protection from antitrust laws if it negotiated with individual players instead of a union.

The only way a new CBA is ratified is if the threat of legal action -- or a summary judgment with substantial damages -- forces the league to abandon its position and cave to the players.

I'll let you determine the odds of that based on your working knowledge of, you know, logic. But if you want the legal perspective, based on the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in the NFL case as well as antitrust standards, David Scupp, an antitrust litigation expert, says that while the players may not have a lot to lose in this pursuit based on where the CBA negotiations were, "their prospects are not great."

Why didn't the players decertify?

Because it takes longer. But the other thing to consider is that an involuntary decertification provides protection from the "sham" argument. A movement from within the players against union leadership to dissolve the union is pretty unlikely to be determined to be a sham. In contrast, the disclaimer of interest is more succeptible to that, although the players have have substantial evidence that disclaiming was their only option after the league negotiator repeatedly issued ultimatums and informed them that negotiations were over unless the players accepted their offer. That's one of the many questions to be answered.

What happens next?

If we assume the players are going to file suit -- which is what's going to happen, that's why you do this -- then the first question is where the case will be heard. The players will want California, the 9th Circuit, which is more favorable toward unions. The league will push for the same court they filed suit in, the 2nd Circuit in New York, which has been their friend in the past. From there, the players will ask for a summary judgment. The court proceedings regarding the actual suit cannot begin until the issue of where the case will be heard is settled, a process that takes more time off the season's clock.

A summary judgment? Not to get too technical on you, but it's basically looking for the court to say, "Obviously! Of course the NBA is wrong! Here you go!" It seeks to circumvent a trial in cases with no disputes of "material fact." Scupp told CBSSports.com that a summary judgment is granted when the court rules there are "no issues of fact" and that a trial is not needed. In short, the players want to get around the wait of a trial and gain a decision in their favor as quickly as possible. There still have to be motions, exhibits, discovery, etc., so a summary judgment could take longer than an injunction -- but it potentially has more value. The NFL players got an injunction lifting the lockout in their antitrust case against the NFL, but it was lifted in a matter of days while the 8th Circuit considered the appeal.

Scupp says the players could file for the summary judgment specifically on the grounds that the NBA's lockout is illegal. In that scenario, if granted, the players could earn triple their lost salary in damages -- as opposed to an injunction, which would simply lift the lockout and force the players to resume play. Ken Berger of CBSSports.com reports that if the summary judgment was granted in 60 days, which is the soonest it could be (and even that is a stretch), the league could face damages as high as $2.4 billion. As the 8th Circuit ruled that the court could not enjoin such a lockout, the players are looking to dodge that question and instead focus on the fact that the court did not rule on whether the lockout was in fact legal.

In any instance, Scupp says it's likely the NBA would file a counter-motion for its own summary judgment. Such a ruling would block any further efforts by the players outside of appeal on the grounds of the lockout being illegal. The NBA also would appeal a possible summary judgment against it, but the impact of having a potentially multi-billion-dollar judgment against the owners might be enough to prompt them to settle.

Also, there are expected to be at least two lawsuits -- a class-action suit challenging every aspect of the NBA business, such as the salary cap, luxury tax and draft as antitrust violations, and another one specifically on behalf of rookies and free agents.

Why the second one? In the majority opinion in the NFL case, the 8th Circuit panel specifically questioned whether employees who are not under contract can be locked out. It could be on behalf of such rookies and free agents that the players would be able to achieve their quickest and most decisive legal opinion rejecting the NBA's operations as illegal.

From there, we start to answer the question of whether the players have a case here, and what legal victories they can obtain. Then the league will appeal, and the question will be whether the impact of the initial ruling will be sustained during the appeals process. Then the players need to survive the appeals process, and likely more until the league either decides to cave or it runs out of courts to appeal to.

It could take years for the case to wind through the appeals process, something that neither side will want to sustain given the current state of negotiations.

Get player news notifications, manage your team and check scores
- all updated in real time. Download the CBS Fantasy App.

  •  
 
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
 
 
Player News
Hawks C Al Horford working way out of slump
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(4:55 pm ET) Hawks center Al Horford has slowed down a bit from the All-Star pace he put up in the first half of the season, but feels confident that he can find his touch again, per the Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Horford was shooting more than 54 percent prior to the break, but in the second half of the season, his FG percentage has dipped down to 46.5 percent and seen his points average fall to 12.8 points. 

"The thing is, my shots have been feeling good," Horford said. "For some reason, they just aren’t going. I’m going to stay aggressive and do what I do. I know everything will be fine."


Rockets recall center Clint Capela from NBA Development League
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(4:18 pm ET) The Rockets announced Friday that they have recalled center Clint Capela from the Rio Grande Valley Vipers of the NBA Development League. In 37 games with Rio Grande, Capela averaged 16.1 points, 9.7 rebounds and 3.0 blocks. Capela has played in six games with the Rockets this season, but has yet to score a point. 

Rockets F Terrence Jones (lung) making strides
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(3:45 pm ET) Rockets forward Terrence Jones, who has been out of the lineup with a partially collapsed lung, rode a stationary bike Friday, the first step in his recovery, per the Houston Chronicle

Jones could be ready to start on-court workouts next week, when the Rockets return from a road trip. He hasn't played since March 19, after a collision with Denver's Kenneth Faried led to the injury, which included Jones spending two days in the hospital. 

In 25 games this season, Jones is averaging 12.4 points and 7.4 rebounds. 


Bulls F Doug McDermott (back) questionable Friday
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(3:30 pm ET) Bulls forward Doug McDermott remains questionable for Friday's game due to back soreness, according to the team's radio announcer. McDermott did not play Wednesday due to the ailment. In 35 games this season, McDermott is averaging 3.1 points and 1.2 rebounds per game. 

Thunder F Kevin Durant to have foot surgery, miss rest of season
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(3:02 pm ET) The Thunder released a statement from General Manager Sam Presti on Friday, announcing that forward Kevin Durant will undergo another foot surgery and miss the remainder of the 2014-15 season. 

After consulting with two specialists this week, the team and Durant came to the conclusion that a bone graft procedure would be the best approach to repair the Jones fracture that Durant suffered. 

Dr. Martin O'Malley will perform the surgery next week in New York and Durant is expected to return to basketball activities in four-to-six months. Durant averaged 25.4 points and 6.6 rebounds per game before the injury.


Aldridge, Batum, Kaman all probable for Blazers on Friday
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(2:51 pm ET) The Trail Blazers announced that forwards LaMarcus Aldridge and Nicolas Batum, and center Chris Kaman are all probable for Friday night's contest against the Suns, and according to The Oregonian, all three will play, with Batum and Aldridge starting. 

Aldridge has been dealing with an injury to his left index finger, but he played Wednesday and scored 19 points. Batum has been battling a back issue, which kept him the Blazers' last two contests. And Kaman has a shoulder strain that has kept him out of action for the last three contests. 

The Trail Blazers are 2 1/2-point favorites. 


Jazz F Gordon Hayward probable for Friday
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(2:29 pm ET) Gordon Hayward participated in shootaround Friday and the forward remains probable for the Jazz's contest against the Suns, per the team's radio announcer. Hayward has missed the last two games while recovering from an AC sprain.


Suns guards Bledsoe, Knight both game-time decisions
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(2:17 pm ET) Suns guards Eric Bledsoe and Brandon Knight are game-time decisions for Friday's contest against the Trail Blazers, per the team's website. 

Suns coach Jeff Hornacek said Bledsoe was feeling better from a stomach illness that caused him to miss Thursday's practice, while Knight practiced on the ankle that has caused him to miss seven straight contests. 

The Suns are 2 1/2-point underdogs. 


Thunder C Steven Adams likely to play Saturday
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(1:54 pm ET) Thunder center Steven Adams, who is dealing with an elbow injury, among other ailments, was a full participant practice Friday and expects to play in the team's game against the Jazz, per The Oklahoman. Adams said he was "banged up" but ready to play. He's averaging 7.8 points and 7.4 rebounds in 60 games. 

Pelicans guard Jrue Holiday (leg) remains cautious about injury
by Elliott Smith | Staff Writer
(1:34 pm ET) Pelicans guard Jrue Holiday said Friday he isn't in a hurry to rush back from the stress fracture in his lower leg, citing a need for patience after suffering a setback shortly after the All-Star break in trying to return too quickly, per the New Orleans/Baton Rouge Advocate. 

Holiday said he saw his doctor when the Pelicans played the Clippers on March 22 and would likely have one more visit before determining a course of action. Holiday has not played since Jan. 12.


 
 
 
Top Videos
Rankings