Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!
      
Fantasy Football Today
2013 Draft Prep Guide
Gameday Inactives
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Get Your Draft Board
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Red Zone Stats
Teams
Schedules
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Playoff Challenge
Commissioner
Prize Leagues
Free
Office Pool Manager
Game Pick'em
Player Challenge
Fantasy Baseball Today
2014 Draft Prep Guide
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Rankings
Projections
Teams
Schedules
Probable Pitchers
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injuries
Projections
Rankings
Teams
Schedules
Message Boards
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Teams
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Downloadable Draft Kit
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Teams
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
No Fantasy Teams Found
 
 
 

Offseason Extra: A few points on PATs

Senior Fantasy Writer
  •  

Everyone knows it's good to be in charge and that's certainly the case when it comes to being the commissioner of your Fantasy league. But the ultimate league Commissioner -- Roger Goodell -- recently floated a proposal that would slightly alter the scoring system of the NFL.

He suggested that the extra point become a thing of the past. Touchdowns would become seven-point plays instead of six-point plays. Teams would then have the option of risking one point on one offensive, untimed play from two yards out (just like a two-point conversion is under current rules). If a team scores, it gets the point; if it doesn't then they lose the point and only six points go up on the scoreboard. It is not meant to encourage "going for it" any more often than a team goes for two points now, but it does mean the NFL recognizes the extra point as a boring, unexciting play.

The pro game wouldn't change much as a result; some scoring records would fall. But in Fantasy, the ramifications would be significant. Extra points made up 32.7 percent of all kickers' Fantasy point totals in 2013, assuming all field goals were worth three points. That's a big chunk of their collective stats being sliced off by Goodell's rule change. It opens up a pretty big can of worms for Fantasy owners and commissioners to think about.

Should kicker scoring change?

If kickers aren't kicking extra points anymore, should field goals be worth more in Fantasy than the three points teams get in the NFL? Unless you're trying to preserve the value of kickers it's hard to make the argument for it -- all touchdowns are worth six points in the NFL so they're worth six points in a standard-scoring Fantasy league (for now, keep reading). The exception to that is leagues that give four points for a passing touchdown, but that's done because quarterbacks score more often than other positions.

Check out our Fantasy Football podcast!
There is no better source for entertaining Fantasy advice than our Fantasy Football Today podcast. Dave Richard, Jamey Eisenberg and Adam Aizer will help you pass the time all offseason as you anticipate Draft Day 2014!
Latest episode | Subscribe via iTunes

It goes without saying that if you kept kicker scoring as-is, then you'd see a pretty serious drop in production. For instance, top Fantasy kicker Stephen Gostkowski would go from 168 Fantasy points (that's with bonuses for 50-plus-yard field goals) to 124 without extra points. He'd still be second-best behind Justin Tucker, who would be tops at 126. But take away Matt Prater's 75 extra points and he'd go from the No. 2 slot at 162 points to No. 13 with 87 points. Only nine kickers would have reached 100 or more Fantasy points in 2013 if extra points were eliminated prior to last year and none would average even 8.0 Fantasy points per game.

If we were to try and "bake in" the points lost by extra point elimination into field goals, then we're talking about making field goals worth four points. It's increasing the original number by 33 percent, or about the amount of Fantasy points lost on average if extra points were history. Kickers should continue to score about as many Fantasy points as they do now if that were to become the case. It doesn't feel "right" but it's an option.

Should the kicker be combined with the DST?

Combining kickers with DSTs encompasses all the necessary evils of football into one tidy position on your roster -- and actually makes it more valuable.

As of now, the best DSTs can land anywhere from 225 to 260 Fantasy points in standard leagues over the course of a season, as much or more than the top receivers and tight ends typically get. Throw in field goals and we're talking about units that could deliver well over 300 points per year. That's way better than what you'll get from running backs, receivers and tight ends -- it's on pace with the decent quarterbacks in Fantasy.

But it also makes an already unpredictable position even more of a crapshoot. Predicting special-teams scores is borderline impossible, save for the unit that consistently gives up huge returns week after week. Predicting field goals isn't quite as impossible but it's still a challenge since kicks can be missed. Predicting defensive play is the easiest of the three, but how many times have we preached a "favorable matchup" because of an offense's ineptitude only to see it collapse? All three are huge wild cards when it comes to Fantasy.

It also doesn't change the fact that defenses are still the primary producer of the unit. We took the Fantasy point totals from DSTs last year and added what their corresponding kickers would have scored if only awarded points for field goals (and a two-point bonus for 50-plus yards). While the combined units scored way more, their ranking was basically the same:

Rank DST FPTS Rank K+DST FPTS
1 Seahawks 264 1 Chiefs 381
2 Chiefs 257 2 Seahawks 369
3 Panthers 246 3 Panthers 350
4 Bengals 227 4 49ers 344
5 49ers 218 5 Cardinals 322
6 Cardinals 215 6 Rams 318
7 Rams 205 7 Bengals 311
8 Bills 190 8 Bills 286
9 Colts 176 9 Colts 285
10 Saints 175 10 Saints 280
11 Dolphins 172 11 Dolphins 278
12 Patriots 172 12 Broncos 265

This paints the picture that if your league were to combine kickers and DSTs that you could get away with ignoring the kicking aspect since the results seem based more on the success of the defense than anything else. In this case, kickers are fairly immaterial -- something that you might have felt even before Goodell's idea came to light. The difference is that an owner could start a kicker from a different team than his defense and potentially scored more Fantasy points. But it still suggests kickers are frivolous when it comes to Fantasy.

And if this is the case, then the question must be asked ...

Should the kicker be eliminated from Fantasy?

Look, if they're already not doing a lot for us and are going to do 32.7 percent less, then why have them at all? Just because NFL teams have them? Just because we've had to deal with them all these years?

If a league booted kickers from lineups and did nothing else then it would be a little sad. One less round to draft, one less spot to fill and one less player to accrue points from. I'd rather have a kicker to put into lineups and get some points than nothing at all. Hopefully your commissioner isn't so uncreative and boring that they'll just bounce kickers and do nothing else.

What would be more fun is to eliminate the kicker but not the roster spot he leaves behind. League commissioners could replace kickers with a flex, a second quarterback or something else. There's a world of possibilities, and if kickers are set to score fewer points than they have in the past then they shouldn't be sacred. Imagine cutting a kicker and adding a flex -- the challenge and fun of Fantasy would be kicked up a notch.

Should touchdowns count for seven?!

So if the NFL flushes extra points and gives players seven points for a touchdown, should the players get credit for those seven points in Fantasy instead of six?

The answer is yes. Why not? We give the full six points for a score now -- if the score counts for seven with the extra point out of the rulebook then the player(s) responsible should get credit for it.

And when teams go for the conversion and get it, the players involved should pick up an extra Fantasy point. Only makes sense.

Here's where things get sticky: What happens when a team goes for the eighth point and doesn't get it? The team loses a point, but should the player who scored in the first place also lose a Fantasy point? What about the players involved in the conversion attempt itself?

Commissioners have the option to make touchdowns count for whatever they want, but it stands to reason that the act of scoring a touchdown under these proposed rules is a seven-point play, period. The decision to risk a point on the conversion is a separate play that shouldn't impact the previous play, especially if the player scoring has nothing to do with the conversion attempt. I would also rule that there is no individual penalty for a failed one-point conversion attempt even though the NFL team will lose a point for trying it. It keeps the bookkeeping simple and leaves turnovers as the only meaningful way to lose Fantasy points. That's the way I'd lean on it.

We're looking at the first possible time in professional sports history where a team can lose points after scoring them on a previous play. It's unchartered territory for all of us, including the league involved. Whatever it takes to enhance the Fantasy experience based on the rule change is what's most important.

Stay in touch with the most passionate Fantasy staff in the business by following us via Twitter @CBSFantasyFB . You can also follow Dave at @daverichard .

  •  
 
 
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
 
 
Player News
Jets backfield takes shape following Johnson signing
by Jamey Eisenberg | Senior Fantasy Writer
(5:53 pm ET) With the Jets signing Chris Johnson on Wednesday, the rest of their backfield should start to take shape, reports the New York Daily News.

The report says Johnson and Chris Ivory will work as a tandem, and Bilal Powell will be the No. 3 running back. Mike Goodson is expected to be released before the start of the season.


Chris Johnson excited for 'fresh start'
by Jamey Eisenberg | Senior Fantasy Writer
(5:48 pm ET) New Jets running back Chris Johnson's two-year deal is worth $8 million with another $1 million in incentives, reports Pro Football Talk. Johnson was scheduled to make $8 million for the Titans in 2014 alone before he was released.

Meanwhile, Johnson told the Tennessean that he's looking forward to this opportunity with the Jets.

"I have a fresh start. Now I am going to go out there with a chip on my shoulder," Johnson said. "I know a lot of people are doubting me. I want to prove everybody wrong who has doubts in me."


Bengals sign punter T.J. Conley
by Jamey Eisenberg | Senior Fantasy Writer
(4:21 pm ET) The Bengals signed free agent punter T.J. Conley on Wednesday. 

Conley punted in 16 games for the Jets in 2011. He averaged 42.7 yards on 92 punts, and his 38.8-yard net average was the highest in Jets history. He had 32 inside-20 kicks with just six touchbacks, and his plus-26 differential on inside-20s to touchbacks ranked tied for third in the NFL.

Conley did not play in the 2012 or 2013 regular seasons. He was with the Jets in the 2012 preseason and with Cleveland in the 2013 preseason.

Conley will challenge incumbent Kevin Huber for the starting job, but most likely he won't make the final roster.


Chris Johnson signs two-year deal with the Jets
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(3:19 pm ET) The Jets have signed running back Chris Johnson to a two-year deal, league sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter. 

Johnson told reporters on Tuesday he was taking free agency one day at a time and added that he had other visits planned, but the Jets must have made him an improved offer to lock up the one-time 2,000-yard running back. 

Johnson has totaled at least 1,400 yards in each of his last four seasons with the Titans since running for 2,006 yards in 2009. He also scored 10 touchdowns in 2013 (four receiving). 


Clay Matthews says it's thumbs up for training camp
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(1:37 pm ET) Packers linebacker Clay Matthews said he's diligently rehabbing his injured thumb, comparing it to a torn ACL rather than a typical bone break. As part of the injury he also had surgery on his forearm, which got damaged when he re-injured the thumb late last season. But he told USA Today that he'll be ready for the start of training camp, though he'll miss offseason workouts. 

Mike James resumes running and cutting
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(1:28 pm ET) Buccaneers running back Mike James is working his way back into football shape after breaking his left ankle last season. He told the Tampa Bay Times that he's been running and cutting and is aiming to get back to full strength and speed. Asked if he would be ready for the team's April minicamp, James said he and the team are "taking everything day by day." 

Josh Freeman signs with Giants
by Jamey Eisenberg | Senior Fantasy Writer
(12:33 pm ET) The Giants have signed quarterback Josh Freeman, reports FOX Sports.

Freeman spent last season with the Buccaneers and Vikings. His only appearance for Minnesota was against the Giants, and he completed 20 of 53 passes for 190 yards and an interception.

Freeman will try and make the final roster for the Giants as a backup to Eli Manning, who is coming off ankle surgery this offseason. The Giants also have Curtis Painter and Ryan Nassib on the roster.


Rob Gronkowski will 'take his time' coming back
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(12:26 pm ET) Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski will "take his time and then take more time" coming back from a torn ACL suffered last season, a source told Bleacher Report

Gronkowski's heart was questioned last year when he took his time coming back from forearm and back procedures. This year he might not care how long he takes as he wants to practice patience in his rehab. 

The knee injury happened in December of last year. Usually it takes nine months to come back from an ACL injury without incident. That would mean he'd be ready to hit the field by late August. 


Haloti Ngata turned down extension with Ravens
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(11:10 am ET) Looking to free up cap space earlier this offseason, the Ravens offered a "lucrative, long-term" deal with defensive lineman Haloti Ngata so that he wouldn't cost $16 million in cap space. Ngata, 30 years old with two years left on his current deal, wasn't willing to take the extension, NFL Network reports. 

Report: Ravens planning to add two running backs
by Dave Richard | Senior Fantasy Writer
(10:47 am ET) The Ravens are aware of what's been going on with Ray Rice this offseason but were planning to add a pair of running backs this offseason anyway. NFL Network reports that they now believe that one of those two might have to start depending on what happens with Rice. 

The veteran running back had a horrible 2013 season (under 1,000 total yards) and then was indicted on a third-degree aggravated assault charge when he struck his then-fiancee and current wife Janay Palmer in an Atlantic City casino. 


 
 
 
Rankings