Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!
      
Fantasy Football Today
Fantasy Football Today Blog
Gameday Inactives
2014 Draft Prep Guide
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Get Your Draft Board
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Scores
Fantasy Games
Playoff Challenge
Commissioner
Prize Leagues
Free
Office Pool Manager
Game Pick'em
Player Challenge
Fantasy Baseball Today
Fantasy Baseball Today Blog
2015 Draft Prep Guide
Mock Drafts
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Rankings
Projections
Schedules
Probable Pitchers
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injuries
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Message Boards
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Downloadable Draft Kit
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
No Fantasy Teams Found
 
 
 

Offseason Extra: A few points on PATs

Senior Fantasy Writer
  •  

Everyone knows it's good to be in charge and that's certainly the case when it comes to being the commissioner of your Fantasy league. But the ultimate league Commissioner -- Roger Goodell -- recently floated a proposal that would slightly alter the scoring system of the NFL.

He suggested that the extra point become a thing of the past. Touchdowns would become seven-point plays instead of six-point plays. Teams would then have the option of risking one point on one offensive, untimed play from two yards out (just like a two-point conversion is under current rules). If a team scores, it gets the point; if it doesn't then they lose the point and only six points go up on the scoreboard. It is not meant to encourage "going for it" any more often than a team goes for two points now, but it does mean the NFL recognizes the extra point as a boring, unexciting play.

The pro game wouldn't change much as a result; some scoring records would fall. But in Fantasy, the ramifications would be significant. Extra points made up 32.7 percent of all kickers' Fantasy point totals in 2013, assuming all field goals were worth three points. That's a big chunk of their collective stats being sliced off by Goodell's rule change. It opens up a pretty big can of worms for Fantasy owners and commissioners to think about.

Should kicker scoring change?

If kickers aren't kicking extra points anymore, should field goals be worth more in Fantasy than the three points teams get in the NFL? Unless you're trying to preserve the value of kickers it's hard to make the argument for it -- all touchdowns are worth six points in the NFL so they're worth six points in a standard-scoring Fantasy league (for now, keep reading). The exception to that is leagues that give four points for a passing touchdown, but that's done because quarterbacks score more often than other positions.

Check out our Fantasy Football podcast!
There is no better source for entertaining Fantasy advice than our Fantasy Football Today podcast. Dave Richard, Jamey Eisenberg and Adam Aizer will help you pass the time as you anticipate Draft Day 2014!
Latest episode | Subscribe today!

It goes without saying that if you kept kicker scoring as-is, then you'd see a pretty serious drop in production. For instance, top Fantasy kicker Stephen Gostkowski would go from 168 Fantasy points (that's with bonuses for 50-plus-yard field goals) to 124 without extra points. He'd still be second-best behind Justin Tucker, who would be tops at 126. But take away Matt Prater's 75 extra points and he'd go from the No. 2 slot at 162 points to No. 13 with 87 points. Only nine kickers would have reached 100 or more Fantasy points in 2013 if extra points were eliminated prior to last year and none would average even 8.0 Fantasy points per game.

If we were to try and "bake in" the points lost by extra point elimination into field goals, then we're talking about making field goals worth four points. It's increasing the original number by 33 percent, or about the amount of Fantasy points lost on average if extra points were history. Kickers should continue to score about as many Fantasy points as they do now if that were to become the case. It doesn't feel "right" but it's an option.

Should the kicker be combined with the DST?

Combining kickers with DSTs encompasses all the necessary evils of football into one tidy position on your roster -- and actually makes it more valuable.

As of now, the best DSTs can land anywhere from 225 to 260 Fantasy points in standard leagues over the course of a season, as much or more than the top receivers and tight ends typically get. Throw in field goals and we're talking about units that could deliver well over 300 points per year. That's way better than what you'll get from running backs, receivers and tight ends -- it's on pace with the decent quarterbacks in Fantasy.

But it also makes an already unpredictable position even more of a crapshoot. Predicting special-teams scores is borderline impossible, save for the unit that consistently gives up huge returns week after week. Predicting field goals isn't quite as impossible but it's still a challenge since kicks can be missed. Predicting defensive play is the easiest of the three, but how many times have we preached a "favorable matchup" because of an offense's ineptitude only to see it collapse? All three are huge wild cards when it comes to Fantasy.

It also doesn't change the fact that defenses are still the primary producer of the unit. We took the Fantasy point totals from DSTs last year and added what their corresponding kickers would have scored if only awarded points for field goals (and a two-point bonus for 50-plus yards). While the combined units scored way more, their ranking was basically the same:

Rank DST FPTS Rank K+DST FPTS
1 Seahawks 264 1 Chiefs 381
2 Chiefs 257 2 Seahawks 369
3 Panthers 246 3 Panthers 350
4 Bengals 227 4 49ers 344
5 49ers 218 5 Cardinals 322
6 Cardinals 215 6 Rams 318
7 Rams 205 7 Bengals 311
8 Bills 190 8 Bills 286
9 Colts 176 9 Colts 285
10 Saints 175 10 Saints 280
11 Dolphins 172 11 Dolphins 278
12 Patriots 172 12 Broncos 265

This paints the picture that if your league were to combine kickers and DSTs that you could get away with ignoring the kicking aspect since the results seem based more on the success of the defense than anything else. In this case, kickers are fairly immaterial -- something that you might have felt even before Goodell's idea came to light. The difference is that an owner could start a kicker from a different team than his defense and potentially scored more Fantasy points. But it still suggests kickers are frivolous when it comes to Fantasy.

And if this is the case, then the question must be asked ...

Should the kicker be eliminated from Fantasy?

Look, if they're already not doing a lot for us and are going to do 32.7 percent less, then why have them at all? Just because NFL teams have them? Just because we've had to deal with them all these years?

If a league booted kickers from lineups and did nothing else then it would be a little sad. One less round to draft, one less spot to fill and one less player to accrue points from. I'd rather have a kicker to put into lineups and get some points than nothing at all. Hopefully your commissioner isn't so uncreative and boring that they'll just bounce kickers and do nothing else.

What would be more fun is to eliminate the kicker but not the roster spot he leaves behind. League commissioners could replace kickers with a flex, a second quarterback or something else. There's a world of possibilities, and if kickers are set to score fewer points than they have in the past then they shouldn't be sacred. Imagine cutting a kicker and adding a flex -- the challenge and fun of Fantasy would be kicked up a notch.

Should touchdowns count for seven?!

So if the NFL flushes extra points and gives players seven points for a touchdown, should the players get credit for those seven points in Fantasy instead of six?

The answer is yes. Why not? We give the full six points for a score now -- if the score counts for seven with the extra point out of the rulebook then the player(s) responsible should get credit for it.

And when teams go for the conversion and get it, the players involved should pick up an extra Fantasy point. Only makes sense.

Here's where things get sticky: What happens when a team goes for the eighth point and doesn't get it? The team loses a point, but should the player who scored in the first place also lose a Fantasy point? What about the players involved in the conversion attempt itself?

Commissioners have the option to make touchdowns count for whatever they want, but it stands to reason that the act of scoring a touchdown under these proposed rules is a seven-point play, period. The decision to risk a point on the conversion is a separate play that shouldn't impact the previous play, especially if the player scoring has nothing to do with the conversion attempt. I would also rule that there is no individual penalty for a failed one-point conversion attempt even though the NFL team will lose a point for trying it. It keeps the bookkeeping simple and leaves turnovers as the only meaningful way to lose Fantasy points. That's the way I'd lean on it.

We're looking at the first possible time in professional sports history where a team can lose points after scoring them on a previous play. It's unchartered territory for all of us, including the league involved. Whatever it takes to enhance the Fantasy experience based on the rule change is what's most important.

Stay in touch with the most passionate Fantasy staff in the business by following us via Twitter @CBSFantasyFB . You can also follow Dave at @daverichard .

Get player news notifications, manage your team and check scores
- all updated in real time. Download the CBS Fantasy App.

  •  
 
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
 
 
Player News
Report: Buccaneers bringing in Dan Connolly for a visit
by Shawn Krest | CBSSports.com
(9:11 pm ET) Former Patriots offensive guard Dan Connolly will visit the Buccaneers on Tuesday, per a report by Fox's Ross Jones, citing a source. 

Connolly has played in 87 games for the Patriots in the last seven years and hasn't played in fewer than 13 games in a season since 2008. 


Steelers RB DeAngelo WIlliams says signing was easy decision
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(9:03 pm ET) After playing his first nine seasons with the Panthers, running back DeAngelo Williams signed a two-year, $4 million contract with the Steelers this offseason. Among his many thoughts on the signing, he called it an easy decision, according to the Sporting News.

“I didn’t know they wanted me. I had never been on a visit before,” Williams said. “I was with the same organization for nine years. When I got the call and they said, 'hey we want to bring you in for a visit' I took it as that. Had they said we wanted to bring you in for a signing I would have had a different mindset. I had no idea what was going to transpire when I got here.”

Williams added that he is willing to do whatever it takes to get the team to the next level.

“It’s the opportunity to take maybe one or two reps or whatever it takes to make this team better,” Williams said. “That is what I will do. I want to make it to a Super Bowl and win it. I know this team has that potential and they can do it.

“Coming here was an easy decision. This is a Super Bowl contending team. Every veteran out there, veteran or rookie, they want to go to the Super Bowl and win it and get the best opportunity. I think the best opportunity is here in Pittsburgh.”

Williams has rushed for 6,846 yards on 1,432 carries with 46 rushing touchdowns in his career.


Lions WR Golden Tate doesn't feel pressure due to loss of Suh
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(8:49 pm ET) Although Lions wide receiver Golden Tate feels the loss of Ndamukong Suh is a blow to the team, he doesn't believe it puts more pressure on the offense, reports ESPN. 

When asked specifically about the subject, Tate was clear about his thoughts.

"No, I don't think it adds any pressure," Tate said by phone Monday. "We just need to be who we are. We know that we have a lot of weapons all over the field. We just need to reach our potential each and every week.

"We just need to go out there and play fundamentally sound football and I have no doubt our defense is going to be really good again this year and we just got to do our jobs. There's no pressure on anyone but to be ourselves and to play good football."

Additionally, Tate recognizes that Suh was a game-changing player for the Lions, but he likes the addition of Haloti Ngata.

"Obviously, losing Suh is a big hit," Tate said. "I don't care what team you are, he's the guy that can change the game. Change an opposing offense's game plan. He affects the game so much. But with that being said, I'm thankful to have [had] the opportunity to play with him for a year and be a part of something special. But the show must go on.

"The guy we got, [Haloti] Ngata, is a heck of a player. I think it's a good pickup for us. I know he has a past with coach Caldwell so he knows the ins and outs of the system, probably. But we're ready to move forward. We can't live in the past and football season must still go on. We're preparing to have a great year and build from last year."

The 26-year-old stated that he plans on focusing on the intricacies of the offensive playbook heading into this season.

"One thing I really want to focus on is learning the playbook a little bit better," Tate said. "I felt like I knew it for the most part, but details, running the plays exactly how Joe Lombardi draws them up, could help us win more games and create more opportunities for myself and our team."

Tate finished his first season with the Lions catching 99 passes for 1,331 yards and four touchdowns.


Report: LB Rolando McClain ends Patriots' visit without contract
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(7:52 pm ET) After visiting the Patriots on Monday, linebacker Rolando McClain and the team did not agree to terms on a contract, according to NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport. The same report states that the visit was a positive one.

McClain played in 13 games last season for the Cowboys, collecting 81 total tackles and one sack. Over his four-year career, the 25-year-old has accumulated 327 total tackles, 7.5 sacks, 23 passes defensed, three interceptions and two forced fumbles.


Cardinals S Tyrann Mathieu looks forward to being healthy
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(6:56 pm ET) Cardinals safety Tyrann Mathieu believes that he is regaining his health and he's ready to make an impact this season, according to the team's website.

“It’s been a long time since I’ve been healthy,” Mathieu said Monday. “Last year I felt like I took a back seat. I played well my rookie year and then last year it was kind of, eh, I was there but I wasn’t there. This (year) is more important for me because I really want to let everyone know I’m back and I can still make some plays.”

Mathieu tore his ACL and LCL toward the end of the 2013 season. He recently said that the comeback was "way harder than I thought."

Head coach Bruce Arians talked about how Mathieu was not himself last season.

“You saw him fight through it last year,” Arians said. “He was not the player he was used to (being) and it was very frustrating for him.”

Mathieu was aware of the chatter from the outside world and he is using that as motivation going forward.

“You hear people talk and I had time to listen to them talk, so it’s like … I hear it,” Mathieu said. “Like I said, I didn’t feel like I made enough plays last year to help our team. I am looking forward to this year because I know I can do it.”

The 22-year-old has registered 106 total tackles, one sack, three interceptions and one forced fumble in 26 games played during his two-year career.


Saints plan to rework Jahri Evans, Cameron Jordan contracts
by Shawn Krest | CBSSports.com
(6:27 pm ET) Saints coach Sean Payton said that the team has a plan in place to rework guard Jahri Evans' contract to help create salary cap space, per ESPN's Mike Triplett

Evans is scheduled to make $6.8 million salary in 2015 and cost $11 million against the cap. 

The team might also extend defensive end Cameron Jordan's contract. Jordan is entering the last year of his contract and is scheduled to make $6.969 million this year.


Rams have agreed to terms with OL Tim Barnes
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(6:16 pm ET) The Rams have agreed to terms with offensive lineman Tim Barnes, reports the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The one-year deal has a maximum value of $1 million. 

Barnes recently visited had a visit with the Chiefs before signing with the Rams. The 26-year-old spent all three of his previous seasons with the Rams, starting four of the 45 games he appeared in.


Report: Brandon Tate visits Chiefs
by Shawn Krest | CBSSports.com
(6:14 pm ET) Free agent wide receiver/kick returner Brandon Tate visited the Chiefs on Monday, according to a report from the NFL Network's Ian Rapoport, citing a source.

Tate had 17 catches for 193 yards and a touchdown for the Bengals last year. He also had a combined 571 yards in kick and punt returns. 


Lions' Riley Reiff open to playing right tackle
by Shawn Krest | CBSSports.com
(6:10 pm ET) Lions coach Jim Caldwell said that Riley Reiff might start at right tackle next season. 

Reiff has started 32 games at left tackle over the last two seasons. The Lions aren't sure that last year's right tackle LaAdrian Waddle will be fully recovered from knee surgery, and backup tackle Cornelius Lucas is better on the left side. 

Reiff told the Daily Republic he doesn't care where he plays. 

 "I like playing, and wherever they want to put me, that's fine. I'll play," he said.


Broncos OL Michael Schofield looking to compete for starting job
by Dave Peters | CBSSports.com
(6:05 pm ET) Broncos offensive lineman Michael Schofield is ready to come in and compete for a starting job this season, reports the Denver Post.

After not dressing for a single game as a rookie, Schofield added weight and he looks forward to fighting for a starting job.

"I am going in there with that mentality. In the NFL everybody is competing," Schofield said during a road trip to see family in Illinois. "They are looking for someone to step up and take over. I want to make that jump."

The third-round draft pick of the Broncos in 2014 struggled with weight issues, but he is now up to 305 pounds. He also recognized that his pass protection needs improvement.

"Personally, I felt there were reasons I wasn't out there (for games). I wasn't consistent enough in pass pro (protection). And my weight was really fluctuating," Schofield said.

Broncos head coach Gary Kubiak believes that the team's zone-blocking scheme can help Schofield elevate his game, and Schofield agrees.

"We like the Schofield kid, so we'll see. We think he's got some flexibility (in where he can play)," Kubiak said. "It will be very competitive."

"I feel like I am better suited for this," Schofield said. "You have to be able to reach block, and I feel the steps required fit me better."


 
 
 
Rankings