Forgot Log-in or  Password? |  Help  Not a member, Register Now!
      
Fantasy Football Today
Fantasy Football Today Blog
Gameday Inactives
2014 Draft Prep Guide
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Get Your Draft Board
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Scores
Fantasy Games
Playoff Challenge
Commissioner
Prize Leagues
Free
Office Pool Manager
Game Pick'em
Player Challenge
Fantasy Baseball Today
Fantasy Baseball Today Blog
Downloadable Draft Kit
Mock Drafts
Player News
Stats
Players
Depth Charts
Roster Trends
Columns
Injury Report
Rankings
Projections
Schedules
Probable Pitchers
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injuries
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Message Boards
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
Downloadable Draft Kit
Player News
Stats
Players
Columns
Injury Report
Projections
Rankings
Schedules
Mock Drafts
Scores
Standings
Fantasy Games
Commissioner
Free
Prize Leagues
No Fantasy Teams Found
 
 
 

Offseason Extra: A few points on PATs

Senior Fantasy Writer
  •  

Everyone knows it's good to be in charge and that's certainly the case when it comes to being the commissioner of your Fantasy league. But the ultimate league Commissioner -- Roger Goodell -- recently floated a proposal that would slightly alter the scoring system of the NFL.

He suggested that the extra point become a thing of the past. Touchdowns would become seven-point plays instead of six-point plays. Teams would then have the option of risking one point on one offensive, untimed play from two yards out (just like a two-point conversion is under current rules). If a team scores, it gets the point; if it doesn't then they lose the point and only six points go up on the scoreboard. It is not meant to encourage "going for it" any more often than a team goes for two points now, but it does mean the NFL recognizes the extra point as a boring, unexciting play.

The pro game wouldn't change much as a result; some scoring records would fall. But in Fantasy, the ramifications would be significant. Extra points made up 32.7 percent of all kickers' Fantasy point totals in 2013, assuming all field goals were worth three points. That's a big chunk of their collective stats being sliced off by Goodell's rule change. It opens up a pretty big can of worms for Fantasy owners and commissioners to think about.

Should kicker scoring change?

If kickers aren't kicking extra points anymore, should field goals be worth more in Fantasy than the three points teams get in the NFL? Unless you're trying to preserve the value of kickers it's hard to make the argument for it -- all touchdowns are worth six points in the NFL so they're worth six points in a standard-scoring Fantasy league (for now, keep reading). The exception to that is leagues that give four points for a passing touchdown, but that's done because quarterbacks score more often than other positions.

Check out our Fantasy Football podcast!
There is no better source for entertaining Fantasy advice than our Fantasy Football Today podcast. Dave Richard, Jamey Eisenberg and Adam Aizer will help you pass the time as you anticipate Draft Day 2014!
Latest episode | Subscribe today!

It goes without saying that if you kept kicker scoring as-is, then you'd see a pretty serious drop in production. For instance, top Fantasy kicker Stephen Gostkowski would go from 168 Fantasy points (that's with bonuses for 50-plus-yard field goals) to 124 without extra points. He'd still be second-best behind Justin Tucker, who would be tops at 126. But take away Matt Prater's 75 extra points and he'd go from the No. 2 slot at 162 points to No. 13 with 87 points. Only nine kickers would have reached 100 or more Fantasy points in 2013 if extra points were eliminated prior to last year and none would average even 8.0 Fantasy points per game.

If we were to try and "bake in" the points lost by extra point elimination into field goals, then we're talking about making field goals worth four points. It's increasing the original number by 33 percent, or about the amount of Fantasy points lost on average if extra points were history. Kickers should continue to score about as many Fantasy points as they do now if that were to become the case. It doesn't feel "right" but it's an option.

Should the kicker be combined with the DST?

Combining kickers with DSTs encompasses all the necessary evils of football into one tidy position on your roster -- and actually makes it more valuable.

As of now, the best DSTs can land anywhere from 225 to 260 Fantasy points in standard leagues over the course of a season, as much or more than the top receivers and tight ends typically get. Throw in field goals and we're talking about units that could deliver well over 300 points per year. That's way better than what you'll get from running backs, receivers and tight ends -- it's on pace with the decent quarterbacks in Fantasy.

But it also makes an already unpredictable position even more of a crapshoot. Predicting special-teams scores is borderline impossible, save for the unit that consistently gives up huge returns week after week. Predicting field goals isn't quite as impossible but it's still a challenge since kicks can be missed. Predicting defensive play is the easiest of the three, but how many times have we preached a "favorable matchup" because of an offense's ineptitude only to see it collapse? All three are huge wild cards when it comes to Fantasy.

It also doesn't change the fact that defenses are still the primary producer of the unit. We took the Fantasy point totals from DSTs last year and added what their corresponding kickers would have scored if only awarded points for field goals (and a two-point bonus for 50-plus yards). While the combined units scored way more, their ranking was basically the same:

Rank DST FPTS Rank K+DST FPTS
1 Seahawks 264 1 Chiefs 381
2 Chiefs 257 2 Seahawks 369
3 Panthers 246 3 Panthers 350
4 Bengals 227 4 49ers 344
5 49ers 218 5 Cardinals 322
6 Cardinals 215 6 Rams 318
7 Rams 205 7 Bengals 311
8 Bills 190 8 Bills 286
9 Colts 176 9 Colts 285
10 Saints 175 10 Saints 280
11 Dolphins 172 11 Dolphins 278
12 Patriots 172 12 Broncos 265

This paints the picture that if your league were to combine kickers and DSTs that you could get away with ignoring the kicking aspect since the results seem based more on the success of the defense than anything else. In this case, kickers are fairly immaterial -- something that you might have felt even before Goodell's idea came to light. The difference is that an owner could start a kicker from a different team than his defense and potentially scored more Fantasy points. But it still suggests kickers are frivolous when it comes to Fantasy.

And if this is the case, then the question must be asked ...

Should the kicker be eliminated from Fantasy?

Look, if they're already not doing a lot for us and are going to do 32.7 percent less, then why have them at all? Just because NFL teams have them? Just because we've had to deal with them all these years?

If a league booted kickers from lineups and did nothing else then it would be a little sad. One less round to draft, one less spot to fill and one less player to accrue points from. I'd rather have a kicker to put into lineups and get some points than nothing at all. Hopefully your commissioner isn't so uncreative and boring that they'll just bounce kickers and do nothing else.

What would be more fun is to eliminate the kicker but not the roster spot he leaves behind. League commissioners could replace kickers with a flex, a second quarterback or something else. There's a world of possibilities, and if kickers are set to score fewer points than they have in the past then they shouldn't be sacred. Imagine cutting a kicker and adding a flex -- the challenge and fun of Fantasy would be kicked up a notch.

Should touchdowns count for seven?!

So if the NFL flushes extra points and gives players seven points for a touchdown, should the players get credit for those seven points in Fantasy instead of six?

The answer is yes. Why not? We give the full six points for a score now -- if the score counts for seven with the extra point out of the rulebook then the player(s) responsible should get credit for it.

And when teams go for the conversion and get it, the players involved should pick up an extra Fantasy point. Only makes sense.

Here's where things get sticky: What happens when a team goes for the eighth point and doesn't get it? The team loses a point, but should the player who scored in the first place also lose a Fantasy point? What about the players involved in the conversion attempt itself?

Commissioners have the option to make touchdowns count for whatever they want, but it stands to reason that the act of scoring a touchdown under these proposed rules is a seven-point play, period. The decision to risk a point on the conversion is a separate play that shouldn't impact the previous play, especially if the player scoring has nothing to do with the conversion attempt. I would also rule that there is no individual penalty for a failed one-point conversion attempt even though the NFL team will lose a point for trying it. It keeps the bookkeeping simple and leaves turnovers as the only meaningful way to lose Fantasy points. That's the way I'd lean on it.

We're looking at the first possible time in professional sports history where a team can lose points after scoring them on a previous play. It's unchartered territory for all of us, including the league involved. Whatever it takes to enhance the Fantasy experience based on the rule change is what's most important.

Stay in touch with the most passionate Fantasy staff in the business by following us via Twitter @CBSFantasyFB . You can also follow Dave at @daverichard .

Get player news notifications, manage your team and check scores
- all updated in real time. Download the CBS Fantasy App.

  •  
 
CBSSports Facebook Google Plus
COMMENTS
Conversation powered by Livefyre
 
 
Player News
Report: Patriots hoping to sign Darrelle Revis to long-term extension
by Brandon Wise | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) The Patriots are reportedly looking to sign cornerback Darrelle Revis to a long-term extension, according Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network.

However, New England has not ruled out paying Revis the $20 million team option in 2015, Rapoport reports. The decision needs to be made by April 1, when a $12 million roster bonus kicks in for Revis.

Revis totaled 47 tackles in 16 games for the Patriots, grabbing two interceptions and forcing one fumble.


C.J. Spiller expecting 'March Madness' style free agency
by Brandon Wise | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) Bills running back C.J. Spiller is getting healthy again. Spiller, who has fully recovered from a shoulder injury, just ended the final season of his contract and is looking at his options for next season.

"Physically, I’m back to 100 percent, back to doing normal activities," Spiller told The Post and Courier on Friday. "As far as football, free agency will start in March, and I’ll get with my people next week and get a game plan together."

Spiller has played five seasons for the Bills, only playing two full years. He ran for 1,244 yards in 2012 with six touchdowns.

"I guess you could say it’ll be March Madness," Spiller said with a smile. "It’ll be a fun March."


Report: Rams among teams interested in trade for Eagles' Foles
by Michael Hurcomb | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) Teams are beginning to show interest in Eagles quarterback Nick Foles, as reports are surfacing Philadelphia is unsure of what to do with the third-year quarterback, per NJ.com. A source said the Rams have interest in Foles should the Eagles choose to trade him this offseason. 

The Titans and Texans have also been mentioned as teams that would have interest in Foles, if he hits the trade market.

It's still unclear if the Eagles would be willing to move Foles. NJ.com reported last week the Eagles, who have the 20th pick in the NFL Draft, are considering making a run at Oregon quarterback Marcus Mariota in the draft. 

"From No. 20, it's certainly not going to be easy,'' a source said. "It's probably going to take moving up twice to do it. There's going to be some wheeling and dealing involved.

"Can it happen? I don't know. But they're going to try."

Eagles head coach Chip Kelly recruited Mariota to Oregon and coached him for two years.

"Obviously, [with] my relationship with coach Kelly, it'd be a lot of fun to be a part of that offense and be a part of that team," Mariota said when asked about a potential reunion with Kelly.

Foles is 15-9 as a starter in the NFL, but he has yet to play a full season. He has completed 61.6 percent of his passes for 6,753 yards, 46 touchdowns and 17 interceptions.


Colts' Luck on new contract: 'There's nothing there right now'
by Michael Hurcomb | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) An ESPN report surfaced last week stating the Colts were working on making quarterback Andrew Luck the highest-paid player in the NFL. When asked about the subject at the Pro Bowl, Luck seemed surprise when he heard the news.

"There's nothing there right now," Luck said, per The Indianapolis Star. "I didn't think about it all during the season and it's only been a few days since it ended. I haven't thought about it. I will have conversations with my agent just because you have to prepare, but I'm not sure where that report came from."

Luck has two years remaining on the $22 million deal he signed as a rookie in 2012. It includes a team option for 2016, which must be exercised later this year.

Luck just completed his third season in the NFL. He has been to the Pro Bowl every year he's been in the NFL. He's gone 11-5 in every season as an NFL starter. He threw for a career-best 40 touchdowns in 2014 and led Indianapolis to the AFC title game this season.


Seahawks' Sherman disappointed he won't receive gifts from Pro Bowl
by Michael Hurcomb | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) In case you missed Sunday's Pro Bowl, Team Irvin knocked off Team Carter, 32-28, thanks to a second-half rally, which included touchdown catches by Emmanuel Sanders and Jimmy Graham.

While many Pro Bowl players that made the original roster were absent from the game due to injuries, Pro Bowl players from the Patriots and Seahawks also did not play due to preparations for next Sunday's Super Bowl.

One player who seemed upset about missing the Pro Bowl was Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman. However, it was for a reason you probably wouldn't suspect.

“Only thing I’m disappointed in is they won’t give us our gifts from the Pro Bowl, which is kind of dumb,” Sherman said, per The Boston Globe. “The NFL is the only league that punishes the players who actually make the All-Star game by not giving them their gifts. It’s supposed to be watches and some other stuff, but we don’t get them so I couldn’t tell you.”


Patriots' Tom Brady on Deflategate: 'My feelings got hurt'
by Michael Hurcomb | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) If you have been out of the loop for the last week, then you might be unaware the Patriots have been under a lot of scrutiny since the AFC title game due to improperly inflated footballs used against the Colts. The media hoopla has transformed the controversy into what we know as Deflategate.

If you haven't been out of the loop, then you are well aware of the nonstop coverage it has received the last week and despite the Patriots pleas for it to go away, it just won't.

Patriots quarterback Tom Brady has had to deal with the backlash from Deflategate, and he found himself talking about the subject again Monday morning during an interview with WEEI.

“It’s all speculation,” Brady said. “I’ve tried to wrap my head around it, too. I’ve done that and I’m trying to move past that, because I continue to try to rehash things. I personalized a lot of things and thought this was all about me, and my feelings got hurt. Then I moved past it, because it’s not serving me. What’s serving me is try to prepare for the game ahead. I’ll deal with whatever happens later. I’ll have my opportunity to try to figure out what happened and figure out a theory like everyone else is trying to do. But this isn’t the time for that. Honestly, I’m not interested in trying to find out right now, because we have the biggest game of our season ahead.”

One topic Brady didn't have a problem addressing was the speculation coach Bill Belichick threw him under the bus during a press conference on Thursday. But Brady came to the defense of Belichick, who has won three Super Bowls as the Patriots coach.

“I’ve never once felt that we’re not on the same page,” Brady said. “He’s a great coach. He’s the only coach I’ve ever played for; he’s the only coach I’d ever want to play for. There’s a lot of people over the years that have criticized him, but I’d say there’s not one player who’s ever played for him who’s not had an unbelievable amount of respect for him and how he prepares and his diligence and his preparation."


Giants' Odell Beckham says he played with hamstring tears
by Chris Cwik | CBSSports.com
(1/26/2015) Giants wide receiver Odell Beckham said he played all season with two tears in his hamstrings, according to the New York Daily News.

Beckham took part in the Pro Bowl on Sunday, but admitted he's still not fully healed. Beckham said the injuries prevented him from getting to that "last gear that I wanted to have." He added that the injuries really bothered him against the Eagles and Colts. Beckham said he was "stumbling" and falling over during those games. He added that he's not sure whether he'll ever be 100 percent again.

The rookie had a tremendous season, hauling in 91 balls for 1,305 yards and 12 touchdowns. 


Patriots' Tom Brady meeting with NFL after Super Bowl 49
by Chris Cwik | CBSSports.com
(1/25/2015) Patriots quarterback Tom Brady doesn't expect to meet with the NFL until after Super Bowl XLIX, according to NFL.com.

The Patriots have been in the headlines all week due to Deflategate, and it appears the situation won't be resolved until after the season. "I believe they're going to do [a meeting] after the season," Brady said. "So we'll deal with it after this game. I think everybody is locked in, ready to go for the Super Bowl." Both Brady and coach Bill Belichick have held separate press conferences during the week to deny the team's involvement in deflating their footballs. 

The Patriots are subject to punishment from the NFL if the league finds any wrongdoing during the investigation. 


Earl Thomas on bad shoulder: 'I'll still play fearless'
by Larry Hartstein | CBSSports.com
(1/25/2015) Seahawks safety Earl Thomas, who dislocated his shoulder in the NFC Championship Game, could remain limited in practice this week ahead of the Super Bowl, reports the Seattle Times. But he said he won't be thinking about the injury against the Patriots.

"When I come alive nothing is limited,’’ he said. “I’ll still play fearless, throw my body around, and let whatever happens, happens.’’

Thomas did allow that he might have to rely more on his teammates.

“My mindset is I have an opportunity to really trust my teammates,’’ he said. “This is the first game I’m going to have to trust them because of my injury. So I really, really, really trust my teammates, and that’s what I’m banking on, my teammates doing what they need to do and I need to come through myself.’’

It's unclear if Thomas will need offseason surgery.

The Seahawks are 1-point underdogs after opening as 2.5-point favorites.


Colts QB Matt Hasselbeck pondering retirement
by Larry Hartstein | CBSSports.com
(1/25/2015) Colts backup quarterback Matt Hasselbeck told ESPN.com he's not sure if he'll retire or return for a 17th season. Hasselbeck, 39, appeared in four games this season and played well, posting a 102.6 passer rating.

He's set to hit unrestricted free agency.


 
 
 
Rankings